Indicators on case laws on sub agent You Should Know
Indicators on case laws on sub agent You Should Know
Blog Article
These provisions utilize to cases where evidence was recorded after the QSO's enforcement, whether or not the transaction occurred before its promulgation. Read more
Additionally it is important to note that granting of seniority to a civil servant without the actual size of service almost violates the whole service structure to be a civil servant inducted in Grade 17 by claiming these types of benefit without any experience be directly posted in any higher quality, which is neither the intention in the legislation nor with the equity. Read more
Matter:-HARASSMENT Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Const. P. five/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Nasira Khalique Thr. Ms. Seema Khalique V/S The Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi CITATION:2025 SHC KHI 46 SHC Citation: SHC-252218 Tag:I have heard the figured out counsel for that parties and perused the record with their assistance. I intentionally not making any detail comments as the issues in the matter between the parties pending adjudication before the concerned court with regard into the interim relief application in terms of Section seven(one) in the Illegal Dispossession Act 2005 at hand over possession in the subjected premises to your petitioner; that Illegal Dispossession Case needs to become decided because of the competent court after hearing the parties if pending as being the petitioner has already sought a similar prayer during the Illegal Dispossession case and as far as the restoration of possession of concerned the trial court must see this part for interim custody of the topic premises If your petitioner was found forcibly evicted from the premises in question if she possessed the valid rent agreement and decision be made within two weeks from the date of receipt of this order.
We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of your information contained on this site, or even the information linked to over the state site. Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can generate inaccuracies. You should read the full case before depending on it for legal research purposes.
184 . Const. P. 469/2022 (D.B.) Zain Ahmed V/S The I.G of Police and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi In the instant case, the guidelines as set forth would not apply, as the criminal Court hasn't convicted the petitioner, alternatively he has long been acquitted with the criminal charges based on evidence and it is actually perfectly-settled regulation that once the civil servant is acquitted while in the criminal case, then on this quite charge he cannot be awarded in any punishment through the department and held him disqualified for your post because acquittal for all long term purposes. The aforesaid proposition has been set at naught via the Supreme Court of Pakistan during the case with the District Police Officer Mainwali and a pair of others v.
Lots of the volumes (together with more recent volumes than the library's holdings) can also be readily available online through the Caselaw Access Project.
The Roes accompanied the boy to his therapy sessions. When they were informed with the boy’s past, they questioned if their children were Risk-free with him in their home. The therapist certain them that they'd almost nothing to fret about.
The law as recognized in previous court rulings; like common legislation, which springs from judicial decisions and tradition.
161 . Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi Coming on the main case, It is usually a nicely-set up proposition of law that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to succeed in a finding of fact or conclusion. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of a fact or evidence inside the Stricto-Sensu, implement to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and summary get support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty with the charge, however, that is topic on the procedure provided under the relevant rules and never otherwise, for your reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not act as appellate authority to re-take pleasure in the evidence and to reach at its independent findings on the evidence.
Will you be looking for Court Information? You should use our site to search for your case or search for any person. Information to the site is updated every 24 hrs at three:00 am. Please Note: Name and Case information found over the search site is provided to be used as reference material and isn't the official court record.
The Cornell Regulation School website offers several different information on legal topics, including citation of case legislation, and in some cases delivers a video tutorial on case citation.
10. Based around the findings in the inquiry committee, this petition isn't regarded maintainable and is also therefore liable to generally be click here dismissed, which is dismissed accordingly with pending application(s) if any. Read more
eight. For your reasons stated earlier mentioned, this court finds the petition to get without legal or factual foundation and therefore dismisses it. This court concurs with the respondents' position as contend during the comments, and their request is Consequently acceded to. All pending applications, if any, may also be dismissed. Read more
Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-225471 Tag:Coming for the main case, Additionally it is a properly-set up proposition of regulation that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to reach a finding of fact or conclusion. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of the fact or evidence in the Stricto-Sensu, implement to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and summary obtain support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty of your charge, however, that is subject matter towards the procedure provided under the relevant rules rather than otherwise, for the reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not act as appellate authority to re-take pleasure in the evidence and to reach at its independent findings over the evidence.